MORE TROOPS IN IRAQ (Follow Up)
I would like to know if Senate Majority leader d; Harry Reid serves eggs and sausage with his waffle. I ask this because on or about the 18th of December, Sen. Reed agreed with the President’s suggestion that more troops were needed in Iraq over the short term. Now, Jan. 9,2007, he is saying he does not support sending more troops to Iraq. Sen. Reed is once again proving himself as indecisive as the rest of the liberals in Washington! These people have no clue whatsoever what the stand for! John Kerry changed his position on key issues in the last Presidential election every time the wind blew! It’s nice to know our new Senate Majority leader also stands for absolutely NOTHING!
What I find fascinating is the democrats think the American people are stupid enough to overlook this garbage. The only reason they have the narrow majority they have is because the american people wanted to give the Republicans a chance to prove they were right about the ever fluctuating positions of democrats So far, so good. The democrats have played right into the hands of the people.
4 Comments
Do you not see by now politicains wilsay whatever they think the public wants to hear?
I personally do not see what good sending more throops over will do.
It has not changed the out come thus far.
We need to cut or loses and move out let them fend for themselves.
We are neglecting our own country allowing gas prices to still be through the roof ,also we have had more companies get up and call it quits since all this started.
It is time that we the american people take care of our own.
Look how long it takes our own country to respond to flood victims,huricane victims and so on in our country.
Face it Bush You are the president of the united states not Zeus the god…..
It’s time to refocus our efforts in Iraq. We need to force that government to be responsible for its people. I don’t agree with Bush’s plan to put more troops in Iraq especially if they aren’t actually going after terrorists.
The response after Katrina was admittedly slow. All aspects of government should have and could have done a better job. It should have started with the mayor of New Orleans and the Governor of Louisiana. Those two sholud have been lynched for their conduct!
I could not agree more.
what type of of leader is it who does not care what happens to his own people.
god help the next natural desaster….
That’s exactly right. The mayor of New Orleans was staying on the top floor of one of the luxury hotels, living it up while people were drowning in the streets. The sick part is, the people re-elected him! How stupid are they?!
Now, the media’s problem with this mess is this, they believe the federal government should have been in there well before the hurricane hit. there are several problems with this thought process, First, The federal government can not unilaterally decide to send troops or anything else into an Individual state unless the Governor of that state declares a state of emergency. That was written into the constitution by the founders in order to protect state’s rights. I beleive the governor of the state must request aid. Second, The mayor declared in a very loud public voice,”WE ARE PREPARED”, by doing that, he literally said there would not be a problem. He believed his plan was the correct action.
Three, if troops and equipment were sent in, during the hurricane, how many of their lives would have been lost? How much equipment would have been destroyed?
So many people and organizations blame Bush, here is the problem with that, noone could have forseen the levi’s destruction. By all rights it should have withstood must of the storm’s force. It didn’t, for whatever reason. Now, we heard the media idiots tell us that funding to shore up, modernize whatever you want to call it, was denied by the fed. government, so everyone assumes it was Bush. That however is not the case. It was Bill Clinton who denied the request for funds to fix the levi system, not George Bush. Apparently, the request had not been made since befor Bush was elected. Therefore, the levi breaking can not be blamed on Bush. It’s on Clinton!
Like I said the other day, All aspects of government could have and should have responded quicker and with more decisive action. Especially the mayor of New Orleans and the governor of Louisiana.